‘Obasanjo goofed on Osun governorship poll’

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo recently criticised the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for allowing supplementary election in parts of Osun State during the September 2018 governorship election. The former President was of the view that the rerun was not necessary, claiming that a winner had emerged in the first round. Assistant Editor LEKE SALUDEEN sought opinions of Nigerians on Obasanjo’s comment.

EMINENT lawyers and stakeholders have faulted former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s comment on the Osun State inconclusive governorship poll. In a letter addressed to the public recently, Obasanjo said: “From what we saw and knew about Osun State governorship election, what was conclusive was declared inconclusive, despite all advice to the contrary.”

Some lawyers said the former President should have taken time to read and understand the rules guiding the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in declaring an election inconclusive. According to them, INEC’s decision on the matter was based on extant law and its guidelines and regulations. They said the electoral umpire’s decision on elections cannot be influenced by public opinion.

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Emeka Ngige, said INEC’s decision to order a rerun in the Osun governorship election was appropriate. He said if the electoral umpire had gone ahead to declare a winner, the tribunal could have nullified the election on the basis that some voters were disenfranchised. He said it would have been wrong to declare a winner, when voting did not take place in some places.

He said: “INEC did the right thing. That was what they did in Anambra in 2013. INEC conducted a rerun in areas where election did not take place. That time, nobody found anything wrong with the Returning Officer answering a phone call. He needed to consult, because it’s a team work. That’s exactly what the Osun Returning Officer did.”

Ngige said apart from Anambra, other precedents were set in Imo and Kogi in previous elections. He recalled that there was a rerun in one local government in Imo State in 2015, when the exercise was disrupted by violence. He added: “Even though Governor Rochas Okorocha had gotten the required number, INEC refused to make a declaration in his favour.” He said Okorocha went to the Federal High Court to stop INEC from conducting the rerun, but the court refused to grant any injunction. The rerun took place and Okorocha won.

Another lawyer, Jibrin Okutepa (SAN), said the 2018 governorship election in Osun State was not the first time INEC would declare an election inconclusive. Besides, he said the electoral umpire had judicial approval from the Supreme Court.

Okutepa cited the case of James Faleke versus INEC that arose from the November 2015 governorship election in Kogi State. He said: “In that case, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) led me and other eminent senior lawyers to argue that the reliance by INEC on its manual for election was unconstitutional, because the constitution has already set out the parameters on how and when a governor should be declared elected in Nigeria.

“We argued that as at the time INEC declared the result of Kogi State governorship election inconclusive, the late Prince Abubakar Audu and James Falake had won the required spread and majority of lawful votes. There was no necessity for the rerun in the polling units whose results or elections were cancelled.

“The trial tribunal, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court did not agree with us. Unless we approach the Supreme Court to overrule itself what INEC did in Osun State is within its powers.”

A law teacher, Mr Wahab Shittu, agreed with Okutepa, saying the declaration made after the Osun governorship election was not new. He said: “My position is that the decision in Faleke versus INEC upholding the right of INEC to declare elections inconclusive, relying on constitutional provisions, the provision of Electoral Act, guidelines of INEC inclusive of its manual as quoted in the Faleke’s case remain a good law.

“If INEC is vested with powers to conduct elections, it should retain incidental powers to follow constitutional provisions and its own established guidelines. Section 179 (2) (a) (b) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) provides, A  candidate for an election to the office of governor of a state shall be deemed to have been duly elected, where there being two or more candidates: (a) he has the highest number of votes cast at the election; and (b) he has not less than one-quarter of all the votes cast in each of at least two-thirds of all the local government areas in the state.

“Section 53 (2) of the Electoral Act 2010 provides: Where the votes cast at an election in any polling unit exceed the number of registered voters in that unit, the result of the election for that unit shall be declared void by the commission and another election may be conducted at a date to be fixed by the commission where the result of that polling unit may affect the overall result in the constituency.

“Section 53 (3) provides: Where an election is nullified in accordance with subsection (2) of this section, there shall be no return for the election until another poll has taken place in the affected area.”

Shittu added: “However, Section 69 of the Electoral Act provides: In an election to the office of the president or governor, whether or not contested and in any elective office, the result shall be ascertained by counting the votes cast for each candidate and subject to the provisions of Sections 133, 134 and 179 of the Constitution, the candidate that receives the highest number of votes shall be declared elected by the appropriate returning officer.

“The returning officer, who is also the Vice Chancellor of the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Prof. Joseph Fuwape, said the election was declared inconclusive because the margin between the two leading candidates of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Gboyega Oyetola and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Ademola Adeleke, was lower than the registered cancelled votes.”

The law teacher said after the first round of the election, Adeleke polled 254,698 votes, while Oyetola scored 254,345 votes. The difference was 353 votes. He added: “The returning officer said the election was marred with irregularities in some polling units in Ife North, Ife South and Orolu local government areas, including cases of card reader malfunctioning, ballot box snatching among others. This, he explained, led to the cancellation of 3,498 votes recorded in the affected polling units. Quoting INEC standing rule, he said INEC declared the election inconclusive because 3,498 were expected in seven polling units across four local governments of the state.”

Shittu said there was disruption of the election in three polling units in Orolu Local Government, which have a combination of 947 voters; in Ife South Local Government, where there was malfunction of Smart Card Readers in two polling units, which affected 1,314 voters; in Ife North, over-voting affected 353 voters in a polling unit and in Osogbo local council, there was no voting in a polling unit that has 884 votes.

The Osun APC spokesman, Mr Kunle Oyatomi, said it was a pity that Obasanjo was using the privilege of his position to express an opinion that was subjudice to a case already in court. Oyatomi said the opinion expressed by the former President at this stage is not only unlawful, but a glaring disrespect for the rule and process of the law.

Post a Comment